you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -5 points 2 months ago (16 children)

Morals are weightless and made up homie

They're not weightless, made up stuff, opinion sure, weightless not so much hence prison and societal normatives we wouldn't imprison people for moral failings if they were weightless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    What's the total weight of morals right now, in Newtons?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    A newton is a measure of force not weight. So how fast are they moving and in what direction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Weight is a force.
    What did you think it was, and what did you think it was measured in?

    Also, ironic to complain about social sciences not being sciences while also failing at basic physics.

    Also, you are mixing up measures and units of measurement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    Pretending to be an arbiter of what is and isn't science and not knowing weight is a force measured in Newton's and mass is measured in grams is pretty funny. If they were doing a bit it would be gold. (If only)(One can dream).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago* (11 children)

    This is a tautology, this is the same argument as "God is real because we live under religious law."

    Like....yeah man, who would ever make up an arcane system of magic unproveable rules about what's Simply Good and Simply Bad and then use that to make laws that help them control people?

    wouldn’t imprison people for moral failings if they were weightless.

    We do not do this, all of Epstein's pedophile associates are still living as sadistic gods on the stolen wealth of nations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    We don't live under religious law so that doesn't apply, cool try though.

    You literally described society ya genius.

    That doesn't negate the fact that 99% of the population knows what they did was morally wrong, you suck ass at examples homie.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago* (8 children)

    Oh right, you're that asshole fascist from that Ukraine thread where you argued with everyone and ignored every point made at you because you covered your ears. Also got banned too!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Yes yes, everyone that disagrees with you is a fascist. You get how that didn't at all apply here and it isn't at all relevant but sure go for character attacks since you clearly can't argue substance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Very relevant actually considering how you act in this thread. That and your chauvinistic and imperialistic views are pretty horrid and does in fact make you a fascist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    No it's character assassination which is against the rules here, attack the argument not the person but we both know you can't do that bud.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Attacking the argument requires you to make one

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 months ago (3 children)