▲ 72 ▼ Why your local LLM feels dumber than it is (forum.level1techs.com) submitted 2 months ago by inari@piefed.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world 103 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (7 children) This is correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 months ago (6 children) Would you also like a link to the English dictionary? Because it’s nowhere near correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago (5 children) I am starting to think you're sponsored by Merriam-Webster permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago (4 children) Perhaps I should seek a sponsorship with all of the mentions this thread has necessitated. Unfortunately I’m not currently on the payroll (or formerly for that matter, lol). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) I don't think you have the cognitive requirements to understand why your dictionary definitions are completely irrelevant here permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) I'm always astonished when there's a discussion about a topic so deep that it's been hotly debated by philosophers for centuries and someone drops in the dictionary definition thinking they solved the whole discourse with a one-liner from the dictionary. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago Exactly. How entitled. permalink fedilink source parent [–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 months ago Words have meanings dog You can’t just say a label applies to something, despite the meaning of that label. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 months ago (6 children) Would you also like a link to the English dictionary? Because it’s nowhere near correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago (5 children) I am starting to think you're sponsored by Merriam-Webster permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago (4 children) Perhaps I should seek a sponsorship with all of the mentions this thread has necessitated. Unfortunately I’m not currently on the payroll (or formerly for that matter, lol). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) I don't think you have the cognitive requirements to understand why your dictionary definitions are completely irrelevant here permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) I'm always astonished when there's a discussion about a topic so deep that it's been hotly debated by philosophers for centuries and someone drops in the dictionary definition thinking they solved the whole discourse with a one-liner from the dictionary. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago Exactly. How entitled. permalink fedilink source parent [–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 months ago Words have meanings dog You can’t just say a label applies to something, despite the meaning of that label. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago (5 children) I am starting to think you're sponsored by Merriam-Webster permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago (4 children) Perhaps I should seek a sponsorship with all of the mentions this thread has necessitated. Unfortunately I’m not currently on the payroll (or formerly for that matter, lol). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) I don't think you have the cognitive requirements to understand why your dictionary definitions are completely irrelevant here permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) I'm always astonished when there's a discussion about a topic so deep that it's been hotly debated by philosophers for centuries and someone drops in the dictionary definition thinking they solved the whole discourse with a one-liner from the dictionary. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago Exactly. How entitled. permalink fedilink source parent [–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 months ago Words have meanings dog You can’t just say a label applies to something, despite the meaning of that label. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago (4 children) Perhaps I should seek a sponsorship with all of the mentions this thread has necessitated. Unfortunately I’m not currently on the payroll (or formerly for that matter, lol). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) I don't think you have the cognitive requirements to understand why your dictionary definitions are completely irrelevant here permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) I'm always astonished when there's a discussion about a topic so deep that it's been hotly debated by philosophers for centuries and someone drops in the dictionary definition thinking they solved the whole discourse with a one-liner from the dictionary. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago Exactly. How entitled. permalink fedilink source parent [–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 months ago Words have meanings dog You can’t just say a label applies to something, despite the meaning of that label. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) I don't think you have the cognitive requirements to understand why your dictionary definitions are completely irrelevant here permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) I'm always astonished when there's a discussion about a topic so deep that it's been hotly debated by philosophers for centuries and someone drops in the dictionary definition thinking they solved the whole discourse with a one-liner from the dictionary. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago Exactly. How entitled. permalink fedilink source parent [–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 months ago Words have meanings dog You can’t just say a label applies to something, despite the meaning of that label. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) I'm always astonished when there's a discussion about a topic so deep that it's been hotly debated by philosophers for centuries and someone drops in the dictionary definition thinking they solved the whole discourse with a one-liner from the dictionary. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago Exactly. How entitled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago Exactly. How entitled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 months ago Words have meanings dog You can’t just say a label applies to something, despite the meaning of that label. permalink fedilink source parent