269
Uber hit with a nearly $1 billion fine for automatically deactivating drivers in Europe (www.engadget.com)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 55 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Until you start breaking these companies up and fining them consequential sums, they won’t notice this. They can afford to ignore you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 27 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    I'd say $1 billion is not inconsequential.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 35 points 2 months ago

    That's the issue - 1 billion sounds like a big enough number. Most people hear it and think "Hah! Just desserts!" but it's not. They make so much money that even 1 billion is something they can easily ignore. The average person has such a poor grasp on just how much money is being accumulated that its easy to fool them into thinking a fine is far more damaging to the company than it is.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    For a company whose business model is based on breaking the rules, fighting tooth and nail to gain influence, and eventually just paying the fines, I'd image they forecast this and decided the risk/reward was worth it. It's just 2% of annual revenue.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    From the article:

    "This time around, the AP said that the 824.9 million euro fine was calculated as the maximum penalty that's derived from four percent of a company's worldwide annual turnover."

    Annual turnover is revenue, so top line money, before taxes, expenses, etc. They profited a little over $10 billion last year, so a nearly $1 billion fine is a little less than 10% of their profit.

    I wouldn't call it insignificant - as a percentage of profit, it's not bad. But when we're talking about billions, it's still probably not enough to get them to stop.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago

    If we always make the point that all they care about is money do we not think that thwre are excercises being done now to figure out if this was a net money maker? Which of course it wasn't. It is consequential.

    I agree to break up big tech but its not like this is owned by apple either.

    Same happens with google, they get fined for whatever and everyone points at their net worth as a means to argue for higher fines, which is sometimes relevant but a lot of the time the fine is more than they make from the specific breach.

    Its like catching Capone on tax evasion and giving out he didnt get the chair. We know he is scum but today was about his taxes.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent