▲ 1202 ▼ Grand Jury Declines to Indict Man Caught on Camera Destroying Flock Pole (futurism.com) submitted 2 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 176 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] ignominous_wombat@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 0 points 2 months ago (2 children) You think that because you have a defective logic. I comminicated what I was told, I did not endorse it as triue. You will never achieve literary greatness with your logic here pal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ignominous_wombat@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 0 points 2 months ago* I didn't read past your first sentence, because you already discredited yourself. I communicated what I was told, I quantified a rumour, I did not qualify it. The fact that you don't know the difference means you are not worth responding to because you use defective reasoning. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 0 points 2 months ago (2 children) You think that because you have a defective logic. I comminicated what I was told, I did not endorse it as triue. You will never achieve literary greatness with your logic here pal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ignominous_wombat@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 0 points 2 months ago* I didn't read past your first sentence, because you already discredited yourself. I communicated what I was told, I quantified a rumour, I did not qualify it. The fact that you don't know the difference means you are not worth responding to because you use defective reasoning. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ignominous_wombat@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 0 points 2 months ago* I didn't read past your first sentence, because you already discredited yourself. I communicated what I was told, I quantified a rumour, I did not qualify it. The fact that you don't know the difference means you are not worth responding to because you use defective reasoning. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 0 points 2 months ago* I didn't read past your first sentence, because you already discredited yourself. I communicated what I was told, I quantified a rumour, I did not qualify it. The fact that you don't know the difference means you are not worth responding to because you use defective reasoning. permalink fedilink source parent