630
Oh no (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/memes@sopuli.xyz
61 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 58 points 2 months ago (14 children)

How does survivorship bias apply to seeing less AI? Does it mean that it’s like hidden now or something? I don’t get the meme!! 😭

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 170 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    It means you've lost the ability to identify it, BC there isn't any less of it

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    You would expect that the amount of people complaining about ai generated images would cause people to avoid using them

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago* (8 children)

    Why?

    I've definitely noticed more assholes responding with chatbot generated arguments.

    And don't call it ai. Industry buzz term. Anti-labor anti-human anti-ai.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Why should i not use a term that has been in use for at least a decade? I have specifically mentioned ai generated images to not have it included with the actually useful ai

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    It has existed since at least the 1960s,probably earlier, and been common use among SciFi nerds since at least the 80s.

    This is not ai. We do not have ai. Nothing currently extant was made with the existence of ai, because ai does not exist at present. If we ever do invent ai, you're going to look like an excitable wide eyed bigot and it's going to look cringe as fuck. In the meantime it is used to create buzz and bullshit lies to discipline labor. Contributing to that PR push by using their dishonest language is an active strike against the power of workers, organized and not. It also takes research dollars flops etc from real ai research, which used to be a thing, and would be pretty cool to have around.

    I'll spare you the explanation of why it's anti human. Be a tool of the oligarchs or don't.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    By "that has been in use for over a decade" i meant with the definition that includes all machine learning. I only said over a decade since the first proof of the term being used before openais gpt 3.5 that i can think of is not from 2 decades ago

    There is also another definition that i know of that has existed for much longer than openais gpt 3.5 that includes a script composed of a bunch of if statements. Have you never heard of video game enemy AI?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

    It's so hard to get people to realize, especially the ones adherent to it, LLMs are not AI.

    it's a roided-up eliza racing to finish a sentence, it's dashing towards token percentages, and can't rationalize much less create.

    depressing how common this is.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    Languages evolve and change. What you described is called "AI" now whether you like it or not.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •