-4
openmic.social — a new open-discourse instance that doesn't shadowban (openmic.social)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
77 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hey all — just launched openmic.social, a general-purpose Lemmy instance with a specific mission: open discourse + transparent, restorative moderation.

The pitch is simple — anyone can grab the mic — and the thing that makes us different is what happens when you cross a line:

  • No shadowbans, ever. If your post is removed or your account is actioned, you're told — what happened, which rule, and how to fix it.
  • We help before we punish. A heads-up and a path back come before a ban. Bans are the last resort, not the first reflex.
  • Moderation in the open. Every call is appealable, publicly, in our !meta community.
  • Hard lines only: nothing illegal, no targeted harassment, no doxxing, no spam. That's what keeps the mic open for everyone.

We're brand new, which means early adopters shape the culture. Come introduce yourself, bring a community that needs a home, or start one — I'll help you set it up and mod it.

🎤 https://openmic.social/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Fair questions — you deserve a direct answer: No. A pro-Nazi community wouldn't be allowed here, and neither is racism, transphobia, or misogyny — "aimed broadly" or not. I in no way support hate.

"Free speech" here means something specific: we don't shadowban, we tell you exactly which rule you broke and give you a path to fix it, and we won't remove you for an unpopular opinion or a hard argument made in good faith. It does not mean a license to dehumanize people for who they are. Bigotry isn't brave dissent — it's harassment with a wider target, and it drives out the very people who make a place worth being in.

If drawing that line costs us the crowd who think "free speech" means "slurs welcome" — good. They were never the point. The mic's open to everyone; it's not a megaphone for hate. Be a good human. It isn't hard. You can debate your point with out dehumanizing others, when you can't, you've already lost the argument.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago*

    “Free speech” here means something specific: we don’t shadowban

    Shadowbanning has nothing to do with speech. I'd recommend you reconsider your verbiage.

    we won’t remove you for an unpopular opinion

    Most instances already don't do that. Which leads me to believe you have unpopular (hateful) opinions and want to create a community where those opinions are welcomed.

    Be a good human. It isn’t hard.

    No, and yet many people fail to. And these are the types who will be attracted to your community.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    You can debate your point with out dehumanizing others, when you can't, you've already lost the argument.

    No. You can’t. And giving a “open mic“ to the Nick Fuenteses and Stephen Millers, and Charlie Kirks of the world who will put on a suit and a tie and try to “debate” you while dehumanizing others with nice sounding words gives them a platform to spread their hate while framing it as a “civilized debate“ rather than the coded bigotry that it is, while you cast aside any responsibility for letting them do it, tossing your hands up and claiming “free speech”.

    It’s plainly and obviously bullshit. It’s like inviting a vampire into the house and then being surprised when everyone turns up dead.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •