you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 24 points 2 months ago (3 children)

As someone who has lived near both sets of mountains, I'll take the Appalachians and Adirondacks over the Rockies.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I love the Adirondacks, but they're not mountains.

    They were when life first started, but not anymore.

    Mt Washington is a mountain tho.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    What angle are you coming at from? As a viewer of mountains? As a hiker? As a Rock climber? Like, what criteria are we viewing this comparison through?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago*

    Mountain-ness. Despite not even being 2 km, Mt Washington's prominence, weather, view, etc all make it more like a mountain, while "mt" Marcy, you can hike in like 3 hours and it's mostly gradual forest trail.

    Washington fills the social role of a mountain, it's something you prepare to hike, bring a bag with food and water and a heavy jacket, maybe even microspikes, you check the weather to make sure you're not going to get swept away by 200+ mph gusts, you leave at daybreak so you don't get caught by night during descent, you get to the top and say "This is definitely a mountain", any Adirondack, you walk up casually with zero preparation , not even water and that's it. Maybe you check for avalanche warnings if it's winter.

  • source
  • parent