▲ 88 ▼ So indecency = progression? (lemmy.world) submitted 3 months ago by Maroon@lemmy.world to c/linkedinlunatics@sh.itjust.works 17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 months ago (2 children) *poor They didn't try to claim. They claimed. Do you still want to criticize a 2L speaker's English grammar? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) They did try. And succeeded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago Yes, but is that really what you intended at the time? 😉 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) They did try. And succeeded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago Yes, but is that really what you intended at the time? 😉 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago Yes, but is that really what you intended at the time? 😉 permalink fedilink source parent