131
The ‘Manosphere’ Isn’t a Movement. It’s a Multibillion-Dollar Grievance Industry (www.wired.com)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/feminism@lemmy.world
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

For many years now, a dark question has haunted parents, teachers, the internet, and media institutions: What’s wrong with young men?

Why, people ask, are boys so politically extreme, spouting misogynist rhetoric, and increasingly drawn into risky crypto schemes and online gambling? How did they become so lonely, with their depression symptoms often overlooked? The male youth vote broke for Trump in the 2024 election following a GOP campaign built on naked appeals to meathead machismo. Yet there are signs that his second term in office has done little to stem the anger of Gen Z men, whose support for the president is now plummeting.

The most common explanation of these interrelated phenomena is that younger men have banded together online under the umbrella of something known as the “manosphere,” usually conceived as an organic right-wing rebellion driving the culture wars. A new study, however, suggests that this is entirely backward: The digital ecosystem that produces red-pilled men is less of a movement than it is a pyramid scheme.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (8 children)

A while back I saw a video by...I wanna say hbomberman, but its been like 5 years, so maybe it was someone else. Their main point was that the left is generally bad at messaging with specific, actionable advice. In comparison, the manosphere is extremely good at providing actionable advice, mixed with right wing propaganda.

Edit: there was an interesting study I came across in a zoebee video recently, where they had an actor dress up like a professor and give a nonsense lecture in an academic setting. Much of the (academic) audience came away thinking they learned something, when there was no content to learn. Point is, charismatic presentation is extremely important. That's why people like Jordan peterson have huge followings.

I think in this case you can split men into three categories: the guys that get it and don't really think about guys that don't, the guys that get it and realize there's potential for grifting the guys that don't, and the guys that don't get it.

The recommendation provided by the article is a little bit of a the blind leading the blind situation. If I knew what to do I'd do it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    the guys that get it and don’t really think about guys that don’t

    How do we get the guys that get it to care about the guys that don't? There's the actionable part that's needed right there.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Well, you need people who are well adjusted and happy in their lives to choose to wade into the garbage dump of inceldom and deal with the toxicity. That's a pretty big ask.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    It's an ask that is demanded of women pretty often when this problem is brought up as a discussion point.

    You're right though. It's a big ask.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (4 children)

    I know, and I'm explicitly trying to avoid that. That's kinda why I point at socialization. The implication is that some base level of social skills development should probably happen at a young age, and our schooling system is very much under equipped for the task.

    Personally, I went to school elsewhere, and my schooling was very much focused on science and math. This was good from a career perspective, not so much everything else.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    I wasn’t accusing you of doing so, just to be clear!

    It’s something I ponder and read about a lot as a mom to a boy. I see so many positives in how he interacts with the world along with his peers. So it’s a question that I come back to time and again. Where are we losing these boys?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Around age 14-15, in my case. Probably a bit earlier, now. That's when I started picking up on my relative lack of friendships and social skills, and started looking for answers to improve both. Then again, I also moved around a lot in my life, so that was almost certainly a factor.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Moving around certainly doesn’t help in that regard. Sorry that you weren’t able to put roots down at that age, so to speak.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •