you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 9 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Not everyone in an emergency has the ability to press 1. Implementing something which requires them to do so sacrifices those people, and I find that unacceptable.

There's a simple answer, and that's engaging sufficient human staff to handle emergencies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    More info for you showing it may not be so simple

    https://www.iaedjournal.org/combating-the-911-staffing-crisis

    https://www.911.gov/newsletters/issue-14/survey-more-than-half-of-911-centers-face-staffing-crisis/

    https://www.reddit.com/r/911dispatchers/comments/1iqdzn0/emergency_staffing_crisis/

    https://www.nena.org/news/669810/Survey-Reveals-Urgent-Challenges-in-9-1-1-Centers-Amid-Staffing-Shortages--Technological-Gaps.htm

    And on and on and on.

    The more I think about this idea of AI use by New Orleans the more sense it makes. As long as it's a human asking the emergency protocol questions and dispatching first responders, falling back to tech for filtering overwhelming call volume during large incidents is a good idea.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Also, human resources cost money and 911 centers already struggle financially. People don't want more taxes, and that's how more staff and equipment is funded

    On top of that, there's a nationwide 911 staffing crisis.

    It's not an easy solution, and ai is a tool that can help.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    I hear you, but imagine the alternative where it takes many tries dialing 911 to reach a human or you never do because the system is overloaded

    Trust me when I tell you that is exactly what is happening today. If you can dial 911 you can press 1, hopefully.

  • source
  • parent