you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18 points 3 months ago (5 children)

If you see someone vandalizing / stealing private surveillance cameras in public areas : No You Didn't.

While I get them in public transit it's still a slippery slope, and could be manually triggered by a (physically protected) driver in needed situation. Then there's the whole everyone with a phone camera uploading them to Google / Apple (and consequently three letter agencies as well) which is the granddaddy of privacy destruction.

At some point, when this all shakes out as the terrible idea many have already suggested, we need to require third party consent for visual recording (like for audio in some jurisdictions) and was once required for profitable publication. If that ends up with a lot more landscapes and art photography online, I'll consider it a win.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    Oh yeah man Police departments all over the country will love that rule about always obtaining consent to record.

    "We can brutalize people even harder now??"

    I do hate the Flock shit and everything else you mentioned though. Idk what the answer is other than sane legislation that is for the people so of course that will not ever happen here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Oh yeah man Police departments all over the country will love that rule about always obtaining consent to record.

    Yeah, good point. An exception here would be good, also not requiring consent to film police (and other actors for state violence) should be baked in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    This gets complicated because you also need to build in an exception for anyone interacting with the police or in the background of the shot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Seems pretty reasonable, with extraordinary powers comes extraordinary oversight. Everything gets destroyed as a matter of course unless legal proceedings ensue within a proscribed time frame, unless third party approval is given. Do you disagree? Do you have a better option? I'm just scratching around, appreciate the input.

  • source
  • parent