▲ 12 ▼ The Future of GNOME Boxes (blogs.gnome.org) submitted 3 months ago by novafunc@discuss.tchncs.de to c/gnome@discuss.tchncs.de 11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] thenextguy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (7 children) shifting to a Flatpak-first (and only) model. Boo! permalink fedilink source hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] bordam@feddit.it 1 point 3 months ago (6 children) What’s wrong with that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] bradboimler@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 child) Not OP but I'd rather not deal with multiple application distribution methods. I'd rather package Boxes myself (I use NixOS BTW) than use Flatpak. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bordam@feddit.it 1 point 3 months ago I do understand, NixOS is soo good, I hope it will be possible for packagers to package it for distros, although not as easily as before permalink fedilink source parent [–] thenextguy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 months ago (3 children) I don't like flatpak and don't want it on my system. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Dezorian@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 months ago (2 children) Please elaborate why? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thenextguy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) It doesn’t solve any problems that I have. It adds complexity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dezorian@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago Yeah so just subjective info, thanks for sharing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bordam@feddit.it 1 point 3 months ago (6 children) What’s wrong with that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] bradboimler@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 child) Not OP but I'd rather not deal with multiple application distribution methods. I'd rather package Boxes myself (I use NixOS BTW) than use Flatpak. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bordam@feddit.it 1 point 3 months ago I do understand, NixOS is soo good, I hope it will be possible for packagers to package it for distros, although not as easily as before permalink fedilink source parent [–] thenextguy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 months ago (3 children) I don't like flatpak and don't want it on my system. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Dezorian@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 months ago (2 children) Please elaborate why? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thenextguy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) It doesn’t solve any problems that I have. It adds complexity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dezorian@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago Yeah so just subjective info, thanks for sharing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bradboimler@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 child) Not OP but I'd rather not deal with multiple application distribution methods. I'd rather package Boxes myself (I use NixOS BTW) than use Flatpak. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bordam@feddit.it 1 point 3 months ago I do understand, NixOS is soo good, I hope it will be possible for packagers to package it for distros, although not as easily as before permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bordam@feddit.it 1 point 3 months ago I do understand, NixOS is soo good, I hope it will be possible for packagers to package it for distros, although not as easily as before permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thenextguy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 months ago (3 children) I don't like flatpak and don't want it on my system. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Dezorian@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 months ago (2 children) Please elaborate why? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thenextguy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) It doesn’t solve any problems that I have. It adds complexity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dezorian@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago Yeah so just subjective info, thanks for sharing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dezorian@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 months ago (2 children) Please elaborate why? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thenextguy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) It doesn’t solve any problems that I have. It adds complexity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dezorian@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago Yeah so just subjective info, thanks for sharing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thenextguy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) It doesn’t solve any problems that I have. It adds complexity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dezorian@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago Yeah so just subjective info, thanks for sharing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dezorian@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago Yeah so just subjective info, thanks for sharing. permalink fedilink source parent