Because God and the universe are not equal.
We have evidence for the universe. We have no evidence for god.
They are of different natures entirely.
Based on your arbitrary, inconsistent definition of "nature".
I mean omnipotence IS hard to comprehend for us since we're human
It's pretty easy: if an omnipotent being existed, they could do anything. They would need nothing. So if an omnipotent being exists, and suffering exists, it is because that omnipotent being wants that suffering to exist.
It's not love. It's a death cult.
You keep going backwards. You assert things about god and then you pretend there are reasons to believe it. If we go ground-up from what we can sense, no god ever enters the picture. There is no reason to assume his existence.
How many genes must be different for two beings to have different natures? Or how is it defined, how is it measured? You're drawing lines arbitrarily and pretending to know things no person can know.
Why did god write such a shitty book? Why are none of his miracles clearly documented? He must not be trying very hard to convince anyone that he is actually there. All evidence suggests that humans invented god.