you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

Wearing a skirt implies consent.

I'm amazed it has to be said, but no, wearing a skirt does not imply consent for anyone to look up it. The fuck kind of rapist thinking is that?

Edit: ITT people with poor reading comprehension skills. “Rapist thinking” doesn’t mean “looking = raping,” it means “the way rapists think.” As in, rapists also think that the clothing someone wears “implies consent” for their actions.

If you’re using the same reasoning as a rapist to justify looking up a woman’s skirt, and you don’t see what’s wrong with that, I worry for the women around you. Be better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 months ago (1 child)
    1. Whatever you wear is what you wear. If skirt is short enough to flash person behind you on stairs, that's on you.
    2. Any physical contact without consent is invalid. The way you dress is not consent.
    3. And if you go for upskirt photo, your target has full right to defend their dignity. By, for example, kicking you off the stairs. Again, consequences of your actions.

    That's my take at least.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Clearly you don't understand the difference between rape, which is a physical assault, and a stare. Eyes don't rape.

    Showing parts of your body implies consent to be looked at, but it is not an invitation to touch or take pictures.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)