86
U.S. resumes strikes against Iran, retaliating against surprise missile attack (www.cnbc.com)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/world
44 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (8 children)

Which report are you referring to? The ones you refered to

This greatly contrasts with your statement that they “stayed at 60% for four years”.

Iran reached 60% at April 16, 2021 and the 10 days war started at June 13, 2025 that's 4 years at 60%. Iran before the usa decided to start the illegal war agreed to zero stockpiling and diluting the stockpile back to 3.67% which proof the enrichment to 60% was simply to bring back the usa to the table of negotiations

These subtle hints suggest you’re basically unfamiliar with these reports and make me wonder how much you really care about this conflict

I care about the conflict and want it to end that's why are i mad when i see scums like you repeating the exact lies that caused the conflict to start. You are literally proving the point in 2020 they had a minimum enrichment of 3.67% respecting the jcpoa. When trump torn up the deal they went over it . why are you expecting iran to continue respecting the term that no longer apply?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    You're still trying to shift the window by using the date of the attack, but I'm glad you started reading the reports :-)

    which proof

    It's like cocking a gun next to a hostage's head as 'proof' that you want to negotiate. How about putting the gun away and letting the hostage go instead?

    When trump torn up the deal they went over it

    No one is forcing them to make nukes. No one is forcing them to make weapons grade uranium. You're treating them like someone who just has to rape and we need to appease them so they agree to rape a little bit less

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (6 children)

    I did not shift anything. You said my claim was false so i gave ytou the proof i was right.

    Agsin there is zero proof that iran was trying to create a nuke

    Your posts is full of the worst most dumb analogies I ever heard

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    If not with the threat of making a nuke, why did they enrich so much to 60%?

    Artistic reasons? Or is the analogy of cocking a gun pretty apt?

    They could have kept enriching to 4% forever and all those people would be alive

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (4 children)

    I already answered the question to bring american back to the jcpoa so they get sanctions relief.

    For a million time there is no proof iran was seeking nukes by american intrligence agencies admission

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (3 children)

    So you don't think the threat wasn't that they'd make nukes if the US didn't lift sanctions?

    What motivation did Obama have to negotiate the JCPOA, if not to prevent Iran from making nukes?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    American president has a long hisory of ignoring american inteligence. Obama did it to make us forget about his warmongering like destroying syria and lybia and bombing multiple other africans countries. If iran wanted a nuke the inteligence would have found they they will go beyond 60% and that they are stsrting to test the delivery system

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •