you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 22 points 3 months ago (5 children)

This whole software bug spiel is to convince everyone that it is unsafe to code without using an LLM. Effectively forcing companies to use LLMs.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 9 points 3 months ago
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (-1 children)

    All the shortcut technical debt is coming due, especially now that there's a tool able to undertake mass analysis with fairly general rules.

    It's getting bad out there, and it's not visible on the surface but a tsunami of bug reports and patches has been sweeping the internet and drowning anything unable to swim.

    For anything that sinks underwater, metaphorically, they're getting grabbed by automated sharks that are now actively on the attack. If you're not rapidly fixing everything and monitoring everything closely you're probably being eaten alive without knowing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow -1 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Bragging about how product is at doing something is the easiest way to advertise product. No conspiracy theories needed.

    They want you to use their LLM to screen your code for bugs. When you do that, you see how surprisingly well it works now and that leads to you wanting to also use it for generating code. That is when you realize that the 20 bucks starter subscription isn't enough to actually use it professionally... which means, you upgrade and they get moar money.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    Didn't they use LLMs to code Win11 though?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-2 replies)