▲ 195 ▼ The weirdest thing about American culture (lemmy.ml) submitted 3 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/funny@lemmy.ml 39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago* (8 children) My guy, every foot measures exactly one foot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (4 children) Yes, and 1 pound is everywhere 1 pound, even on the Moon. The US don't have even a different unit for weight and mass. because when the imperial system was invented they thought that it was the same. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] piranhaconda@mander.xyz 1 point 3 months ago* (3 children) Uh... But a pound IS a pound on the moon, it's a unit of force/weight not mass (I wish we [the US] used metric, just being annoyingly pedantic for fun) Edit: Aaaand apparently my brain didn't read your whole comment, you already addressed the weight/mass thing. Long day, laying in bed w headache, can't read permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago Limmy [sic] explains: What’s heavier, a kilogram of steel or a kilogram of feathers? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) You say it, a Pound is a Pound weight on earth, but weight depends on gravity, so a Pound is only 1/6 Pound on the Moon Imperial system is obsolet crap, maybe enough for a farmer, but in tecnology, science, where you need to work with measures of μ, feet and inches are as usefull like roman numbers for integrals. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] piranhaconda@mander.xyz 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) A pound is still a pound on the moon, since it's a unit of force not mass. It just requires more mass for a scale to measure that force. I'm an engineer that works on spacecraft, I know units, and hate the imperial system and all the conversions I have to do Edit: and it's still useful to differentiate between mass and weight/force, just depends on the context. A doctor would want to know an astronaut's mass to accurately track health. But writing up a fitness plan to maintain muscle mass and bone density, force/weight is more relevant because squatting 100 kilograms on the moon isn't as useful a metric as setting it to a specific force in pounds/newtons permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fancy_Gecko@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) my foot or your foot ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago Yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago On your ass? I don't mind which foot 😂😎 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (4 children) Yes, and 1 pound is everywhere 1 pound, even on the Moon. The US don't have even a different unit for weight and mass. because when the imperial system was invented they thought that it was the same. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] piranhaconda@mander.xyz 1 point 3 months ago* (3 children) Uh... But a pound IS a pound on the moon, it's a unit of force/weight not mass (I wish we [the US] used metric, just being annoyingly pedantic for fun) Edit: Aaaand apparently my brain didn't read your whole comment, you already addressed the weight/mass thing. Long day, laying in bed w headache, can't read permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago Limmy [sic] explains: What’s heavier, a kilogram of steel or a kilogram of feathers? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) You say it, a Pound is a Pound weight on earth, but weight depends on gravity, so a Pound is only 1/6 Pound on the Moon Imperial system is obsolet crap, maybe enough for a farmer, but in tecnology, science, where you need to work with measures of μ, feet and inches are as usefull like roman numbers for integrals. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] piranhaconda@mander.xyz 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) A pound is still a pound on the moon, since it's a unit of force not mass. It just requires more mass for a scale to measure that force. I'm an engineer that works on spacecraft, I know units, and hate the imperial system and all the conversions I have to do Edit: and it's still useful to differentiate between mass and weight/force, just depends on the context. A doctor would want to know an astronaut's mass to accurately track health. But writing up a fitness plan to maintain muscle mass and bone density, force/weight is more relevant because squatting 100 kilograms on the moon isn't as useful a metric as setting it to a specific force in pounds/newtons permalink fedilink source parent
[–] piranhaconda@mander.xyz 1 point 3 months ago* (3 children) Uh... But a pound IS a pound on the moon, it's a unit of force/weight not mass (I wish we [the US] used metric, just being annoyingly pedantic for fun) Edit: Aaaand apparently my brain didn't read your whole comment, you already addressed the weight/mass thing. Long day, laying in bed w headache, can't read permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago Limmy [sic] explains: What’s heavier, a kilogram of steel or a kilogram of feathers? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) You say it, a Pound is a Pound weight on earth, but weight depends on gravity, so a Pound is only 1/6 Pound on the Moon Imperial system is obsolet crap, maybe enough for a farmer, but in tecnology, science, where you need to work with measures of μ, feet and inches are as usefull like roman numbers for integrals. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] piranhaconda@mander.xyz 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) A pound is still a pound on the moon, since it's a unit of force not mass. It just requires more mass for a scale to measure that force. I'm an engineer that works on spacecraft, I know units, and hate the imperial system and all the conversions I have to do Edit: and it's still useful to differentiate between mass and weight/force, just depends on the context. A doctor would want to know an astronaut's mass to accurately track health. But writing up a fitness plan to maintain muscle mass and bone density, force/weight is more relevant because squatting 100 kilograms on the moon isn't as useful a metric as setting it to a specific force in pounds/newtons permalink fedilink source parent
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago Limmy [sic] explains: What’s heavier, a kilogram of steel or a kilogram of feathers? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) You say it, a Pound is a Pound weight on earth, but weight depends on gravity, so a Pound is only 1/6 Pound on the Moon Imperial system is obsolet crap, maybe enough for a farmer, but in tecnology, science, where you need to work with measures of μ, feet and inches are as usefull like roman numbers for integrals. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] piranhaconda@mander.xyz 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) A pound is still a pound on the moon, since it's a unit of force not mass. It just requires more mass for a scale to measure that force. I'm an engineer that works on spacecraft, I know units, and hate the imperial system and all the conversions I have to do Edit: and it's still useful to differentiate between mass and weight/force, just depends on the context. A doctor would want to know an astronaut's mass to accurately track health. But writing up a fitness plan to maintain muscle mass and bone density, force/weight is more relevant because squatting 100 kilograms on the moon isn't as useful a metric as setting it to a specific force in pounds/newtons permalink fedilink source parent
[–] piranhaconda@mander.xyz 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) A pound is still a pound on the moon, since it's a unit of force not mass. It just requires more mass for a scale to measure that force. I'm an engineer that works on spacecraft, I know units, and hate the imperial system and all the conversions I have to do Edit: and it's still useful to differentiate between mass and weight/force, just depends on the context. A doctor would want to know an astronaut's mass to accurately track health. But writing up a fitness plan to maintain muscle mass and bone density, force/weight is more relevant because squatting 100 kilograms on the moon isn't as useful a metric as setting it to a specific force in pounds/newtons permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fancy_Gecko@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) my foot or your foot ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago Yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago On your ass? I don't mind which foot 😂😎 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago On your ass? I don't mind which foot 😂😎 permalink fedilink source parent