that two of the portcullises could be simply climbed over,
"Once such three portcullises were lowered, it would no longer be possible to bypass the first two. Even climbing over them, there is too little working space to break a section of granite nearly a meter and a half long (equal to the sum of the three horizontal thicknesses)"
https://www.greatpyramidexplanation.com/en/news-6/03-antechambers-portcullis.html
It's not impossible that these were designed to be opened repeatedly
It's lazy, but I work from the assumption that the consensus of university historians who have devoted their lives to studying all the data are likely correct. They would have documented wear on the stones from repeated sliding like they documented wear on the bottom of stones from original placement. If their was evidence the portcullis had been opened, it would be the mainstream theory.
It's like how I assume scientists are right when they say vaccines don't cause autism. Sure they might be wrong but it's easier to let specialists specialize.
That said I still really enjoy wild theories about the pyramids!