▲ 38 ▼ Sent this to my friends flexing a "top 65%" score. The site didn't make it clear that's not a good thing. (files.catbox.moe) submitted 7 months ago by mudkip@lemdro.id to c/crappydesign@sh.itjust.works 28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago (4 children) You think a person with 90–100 IQ knows this shit? 🙃 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 point 3 months ago (3 children) I'd say statistics knowledge is probably related to wether you've studied it or not, not so much your iq score permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago (2 children) And a person with low IQ probably wouldn't study much statistics. Probably. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) 90-100 isnt low permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago In a way it is? 94 is below average, and I don't think even the average person is representative of someone who knows about the normal distribution. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 point 3 months ago (3 children) I'd say statistics knowledge is probably related to wether you've studied it or not, not so much your iq score permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago (2 children) And a person with low IQ probably wouldn't study much statistics. Probably. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) 90-100 isnt low permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago In a way it is? 94 is below average, and I don't think even the average person is representative of someone who knows about the normal distribution. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago (2 children) And a person with low IQ probably wouldn't study much statistics. Probably. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) 90-100 isnt low permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago In a way it is? 94 is below average, and I don't think even the average person is representative of someone who knows about the normal distribution. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) 90-100 isnt low permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago In a way it is? 94 is below average, and I don't think even the average person is representative of someone who knows about the normal distribution. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago In a way it is? 94 is below average, and I don't think even the average person is representative of someone who knows about the normal distribution. permalink fedilink source parent