you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (8 children)

Not sure if a poorly conducted study, or just a poorly written one side of the dodgy duopoly fanboy article.

I don't doubt that burning gas is a health hazard in the home, but a longer term, larger based study seems like something that should have happened years ago.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (6 children)

    Links to older studies are literally in the first line of the article.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I used to smoke, it didn't take me 200 years to work out it was bad for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (3 children)

    What do you know about history of tabacco and smoking?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (2 children)

    If you have a spare 200 years, take a seat and listen to my story.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    It's a terrible study. They specifically waited to measure until the study participants were in a flare, and then changed the the stoves out and... gasp a disease that is notoriously flare-y got better

  • source
  • parent