you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 3 months ago (7 children)

There is a good chance that LLMs are sufficiently transformative that courts will decide they don't infringe the copyright of their sources.

How much money are you willing to put in to test that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    So then why are you asking other people to on your behalf?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Hmm, maybe the bits of my post that you didn't quote contain the answer.

    First though you need to understand I'm mainly saying I don't buy their justification.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (3 children)

    No, you made a large assumption that this holds up in court completely, predicated on the idea that anything but would be disastorus.

    I don't buy that premise, and neither does codeberg. So again, why should they put money up in that assumption?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    I made three claims and you talked about a single one, and not in a substantive way.

    This conversation doesn't seem to be going anywhere interesting or useful, so goodbye.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments