you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 3 months ago (4 children)

The "entirety of NATO" didn't back the Ukrainian forces in the first 3 days. Your favourite "superpower" somehow failed to take the capital of a smaller state that was mostly fighting with the very same "superior" hardware Russia is using. It took several weeks, if not months, for western military support to actually arrive on the battlefield. All while those "unbeatable" Russian tanks either got stolen by Ukrainian farmers using tractors, or blown to bits by DIY anti tank explosives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Yeah, in the opening days of the invasion, the western powers were primed to wag their fingers and write sternly worded letters at the presumptive conquest of Ukraine. They weren't happy, but I think they were all too ready to just let it happen.

    Only after Ukraine showed that it actually had some capability and will to successfully resist, then it became worthwhile for more substantial, though still indirect support from a lot of NATO nations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    You're using a lot of quotation marks at me like they're something I said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    The implications of your drivel are quite clear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago

    Not really. My favorite superpower is China, they haven't dropped a bomb in 50 years.

    I don't think Russian hardware is superior, and I don't think Russian tanks are unbeatable.

    All in all, pretty shit comment that rides on a lot of wrong assumptions.

  • source
  • parent