you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

This was the first time in our thread you've mentioned that, so yes I'd agree it could always be safer. You didn't say that though, you said:

Viewed as a good thing because nobody has gotten hurt yet.

Which I and it looks like many others thought you meant you didn't want the barrier there at all. Need to be clearer if you have a point to make like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    The second comment made it pretty clear that the barrier height was the problem. But you either didn't read that or ignored it in favor of arguing. You didn't ask any questions. You made an assumption and then ignored the further clarification. That's on you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    sigh some people will never own up and admit they made a simple mistake. It was a miscommunication man. Just be clear in the future. We aren't mind readers. If you don't include information we won't know about that information.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment