Check out link from Reuters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So, it was just responding to input. Then why do they call it rogue, if they deliberately removed the guardrails, isn't this OpenAIs fault not the AIs? I thought in order for something to go rogue it would have to bypass the guardrails not simply act without them even on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    isn’t this OpenAIs fault not the AIs?

    Yes, it is OpenAI's fault. They also saw it as a great marketing opportunity, guaranteed to get lots of breathless coverage in the press, just like happened with the fable model.

  • source
  • parent