10
what's better than one deceptive, untagged gore link? add a second one! (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/canvas@toast.ooo
NSFW 20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

this should not be allowed

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] -3 points 3 months ago (10 children)

I don't watch live births or open heart surgeries either. it's just untagged gore.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    No, it's very clearly telegraphed gore.

    Nobody would take me seriously if I demanded that Walmart keep their animal corpses in a closed room so that I don't have to see them. Why should people take you seriously when you ask vegans to do the same?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] -1 points 3 months ago* (7 children)

    there is no warning anywhere near the QR code, nor any indication from the cartoon animals on the url.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Why are you like this, commie? Why are you like this? Do you exist specially to be wrong about everything?

    This is literally the first frame in the movie in the QR code. The first frame. The first 3 entire seconds. Why are you like this?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] -2 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    so one must to follow the link before there is any indication.

    what I said is true. it's a link to gore, and it's not tagged

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago* (4 children)

    So your problem isn't that someone might see gore that they weren't prepared for, but rather that the warning isn't placed before you even see a link to the site. What exactly is the problem here? Why do you think this shouldn't be allowed?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

    your problem isn’t that someone might see gore that they weren’t prepared for, but rather that the warning isn’t placed before you even see a link

    if there isn't a warning before they click the link, it's an untagged gore link. your not contesting that it's gore

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I actually do contest that it's gore. This is what you see when you open the website. Where's the gore?

    If your concern is that there's gore in that there video, then good news, there's a huge unmissable warning at the start of it.

    Again I ask. Why do you think this shouldn't be allowed? Who is negatively affected by this?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 0 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I don't believe that you don't think there's gore in the linked video.

    this is to say I believe you are engaging in bad faith

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Show me the untagged gore. You can't, because there isn't any. I already screenshotted the website that that QR code links to and showed you. You could screenshot the movie that the website contains a link to, but that movie contains its own graphic content tag, so that doesn't count.

    I believe you're engaging in bad faith all the time. I believe you exist in bad faith. The only reason I haven't blocked you is because interacting with you is a fun little exercise, like walking down the street and kicking a particularly argumentative soccer ball who always has the worst possible takes

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent