commie comments on what's better than one deceptive, untagged gore link? add a second one!

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

your problem isn’t that someone might see gore that they weren’t prepared for, but rather that the warning isn’t placed before you even see a link

if there isn't a warning before they click the link, it's an untagged gore link. your not contesting that it's gore

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I actually do contest that it's gore. This is what you see when you open the website. Where's the gore?

If your concern is that there's gore in that there video, then good news, there's a huge unmissable warning at the start of it.

Again I ask. Why do you think this shouldn't be allowed? Who is negatively affected by this?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 0 points 3 months ago (1 child)

I don't believe that you don't think there's gore in the linked video.

this is to say I believe you are engaging in bad faith

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

Show me the untagged gore. You can't, because there isn't any. I already screenshotted the website that that QR code links to and showed you. You could screenshot the movie that the website contains a link to, but that movie contains its own graphic content tag, so that doesn't count.

I believe you're engaging in bad faith all the time. I believe you exist in bad faith. The only reason I haven't blocked you is because interacting with you is a fun little exercise, like walking down the street and kicking a particularly argumentative soccer ball who always has the worst possible takes

permalink

fedilink

source

parent