you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 27 points 3 months ago (7 children)

--rant start--

I hate it I hate it such a shitty implication. This headline implies that walking fast makes you sad, but I'm willing to bet a lot that the study didn't actually find such a causal connection.

My guess is that the causal link is stress here. Stressed people walk faster and are also sad.

So make the headline say "scientists say stressed people walk fast" or something because someone will try walking slowly in hopes of that bringing happiness

--rant end--

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    I agree with your rant, this kind of title is annoying.

    I do however also think that doing slow mindful walks will help against stress, so the implication that slow walking brings happiness is not a bad implication. Stressed out fast walking people really should try it. There's no reason to be in a hurry all of the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    But the headline doesn't imply a causal connection, it's your own bias that does

    I read it and immediately assumed it's because stressed people walk faster

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    The tagline is still making a massive leap of logic to a clickbaity conclusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    I didn't even think about taking the title seriously but now that you say it, it does sound ridiculous. I wonder if it's bait for people to come in explain causation (serious) to drum up engagement, or if it's actually just dumb.

  • source
  • parent