To me at least there are 3 parts to art. It sounds like you don't look past the first. This fine, but you lose a lot of the magic of art at the same time.

• Aesthetic appeal. A lot of art is inherently nice to look at. This is the bit you seem to only want.

• Uniqueness A work of art requires time and effort. The end result is often 1 of a kind, or at least exclusive. This is why prints of paintings are valued less than the original.

• Connection This is where the "soul" of a piece of art lives. When an artist makes a piece of art, they put parts of themselves into it. Some are intentional, others are accidental. The art becomes a connection between the mind of the artist and the mind of the viewer/user. This is wide, nebulous and difficult to describe well. It's like when an author puts subtle plot twists or political commentary into a story. Most people will miss it, but a few will connect via it. It could also be religious or cultural factors that get injected unintentionally.

AI art can do the first to some extent. Not that well yet, but getting there. However AI art is also quite low effort for the producer, this vastly reduces the uniqueness value of the work.

The last is the kicker. AI art has messages and connotations in it. They are not deliberate however. It's akin to putting ideas in a blender. You might still pick out bits, but the larger internal structure is gone/randomised. People will still find bits of it. Humans are excellent at finding patterns. The work feels hollow however, the intentional soul that should be like an excellent meal has been reduced to chicken nugget "pink paste". This is doubly bitter when people put mental effort into connecting, but later find out there was nothing really there.