you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 4 months ago* (4 children)

Anarchy isn't a government, it's the empty space between the last one and the next. It's a power vaccum. The inability to act together means we'd all be at the mercy of the next neighbor with an organized military, or stoke a Civil War.

I want to be wrong. Anarchism would be my first choice -- if and only if, it's viable.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Anarchy, as in the flavors that people actually advocate for, is all about working together.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    I have no idea how or why that could possibly make me change my mind, refutes or is even in contrast to anything I said. I know how it works, we're onto if it could.

    In my opinion, there is no scenario where all of humanity mutually agrees... period, much-less -- to abandon their governments in every single country.

    Anarchism wouldn't work otherwise, everyone would be at the mercy of the last military on earth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    People in an anarchist society can agree to join a resisting force. When I think of anarchism in practice, I think more along the lines of the Zapitista territories (maybe I'm incorrect in that), which does indeed have an army.

  • source
  • parent