▲ 65 ▼ Full Movie | AKIRA (English Sub) Action Animation Science Fiction (www.youtube.com) submitted 4 months ago by Fontasia@feddit.nl to c/fullmoviesonyoutube@piefed.social 10 comments fedilink hide all child comments Also available as dub, link in description
[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (4 children) Subs > Dubs. Always. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (3 children) Each to their own, of course. I just think that the original version of a piece of work is always the true version, and I'd rather experience that (as closely as possible - obviously subs aren't quite the original either) than some altered version. Moreso with live action, admittedly, where with a dubbed version you are seeing one actor but hearing another, but when with animation, I want to hear it the way the director chose to present it. I don't think there's anything wrong with preferring it the other way though 👍 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (1 child) Completely agree that refinement can improve a thing - but to me those are still usually better as secondary experiences after trying the original. Interesting variations, having first experienced it as the creator intended. Although I would exclude the director's cut of Aliens, because probably should have been the original, but wasn't released that way. That's that's my preferred version of the film too because it's how Cameron wanted it, rather than, the studio. And I'm not fanatical about it, or anything. It's just a personal rule of thumb :-) So, I would always go with subs over dubs, at least on first viewing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago Fully agreed 😁👍 permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) [–] yakko@feddit.uk 1 point 4 months ago I think it used to be a truism that the subs were better, but a lot of newer works have excellent English voice acting. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (3 children) Each to their own, of course. I just think that the original version of a piece of work is always the true version, and I'd rather experience that (as closely as possible - obviously subs aren't quite the original either) than some altered version. Moreso with live action, admittedly, where with a dubbed version you are seeing one actor but hearing another, but when with animation, I want to hear it the way the director chose to present it. I don't think there's anything wrong with preferring it the other way though 👍 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (1 child) Completely agree that refinement can improve a thing - but to me those are still usually better as secondary experiences after trying the original. Interesting variations, having first experienced it as the creator intended. Although I would exclude the director's cut of Aliens, because probably should have been the original, but wasn't released that way. That's that's my preferred version of the film too because it's how Cameron wanted it, rather than, the studio. And I'm not fanatical about it, or anything. It's just a personal rule of thumb :-) So, I would always go with subs over dubs, at least on first viewing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago Fully agreed 😁👍 permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) [–] yakko@feddit.uk 1 point 4 months ago I think it used to be a truism that the subs were better, but a lot of newer works have excellent English voice acting. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (3 children) Each to their own, of course. I just think that the original version of a piece of work is always the true version, and I'd rather experience that (as closely as possible - obviously subs aren't quite the original either) than some altered version. Moreso with live action, admittedly, where with a dubbed version you are seeing one actor but hearing another, but when with animation, I want to hear it the way the director chose to present it. I don't think there's anything wrong with preferring it the other way though 👍 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (1 child) Completely agree that refinement can improve a thing - but to me those are still usually better as secondary experiences after trying the original. Interesting variations, having first experienced it as the creator intended. Although I would exclude the director's cut of Aliens, because probably should have been the original, but wasn't released that way. That's that's my preferred version of the film too because it's how Cameron wanted it, rather than, the studio. And I'm not fanatical about it, or anything. It's just a personal rule of thumb :-) So, I would always go with subs over dubs, at least on first viewing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago Fully agreed 😁👍 permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) [–] yakko@feddit.uk 1 point 4 months ago I think it used to be a truism that the subs were better, but a lot of newer works have excellent English voice acting. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (1 child) Completely agree that refinement can improve a thing - but to me those are still usually better as secondary experiences after trying the original. Interesting variations, having first experienced it as the creator intended. Although I would exclude the director's cut of Aliens, because probably should have been the original, but wasn't released that way. That's that's my preferred version of the film too because it's how Cameron wanted it, rather than, the studio. And I'm not fanatical about it, or anything. It's just a personal rule of thumb :-) So, I would always go with subs over dubs, at least on first viewing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago Fully agreed 😁👍 permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (1 child) Completely agree that refinement can improve a thing - but to me those are still usually better as secondary experiences after trying the original. Interesting variations, having first experienced it as the creator intended. Although I would exclude the director's cut of Aliens, because probably should have been the original, but wasn't released that way. That's that's my preferred version of the film too because it's how Cameron wanted it, rather than, the studio. And I'm not fanatical about it, or anything. It's just a personal rule of thumb :-) So, I would always go with subs over dubs, at least on first viewing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago Fully agreed 😁👍 permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago Fully agreed 😁👍 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 1 point 4 months ago I think it used to be a truism that the subs were better, but a lot of newer works have excellent English voice acting. permalink fedilink source parent