1010
Cleveland Voted to Kill Its Flock Camera Network. They Have REMAINED ON, With Police Still Using Them (www.gadgetreview.com)
submitted 4 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
201 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 176 points 4 months ago (9 children)

Since they are operating illegally, does that mean we can just take them? They have RAM.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    I don't think they're operating illegally. It's just the city is no longer paying them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    And who did Flock pay for the land usage to install the cameras?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    No one, and the city has not asked them too. When someone puts up a sign by the road that says "Slow Children" they don't pay the city for it, and most people do NOT own the land between the sidewalk and the road, they just mow/maintain it out of moral obligation.

    The city decided not to renew the contract, they need to make another action to ensure their removal, or construct a law about them for them to actually be "illegal".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •