▲ 178 ▼ James Gunn Celebrates ‘Superman’s Box Office Win: “I’m Incredibly Grateful For Your Enthusiasm” (deadline.com) submitted 1 year ago by TheImpressiveX@piefed.social to c/movies@piefed.social 35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (5 children) Naw man, studios only care about money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] golli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago* (4 children) Apart from billionaire pet projects like Laika that might be true, but this seems a bit too reductionist. There are many ways to go about it and the difference matters. Unless you want to tell me the the whole media industry from Netflix to A24 does the exact same thing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) I am not following your thinking. The pet projects are the ones done for passion and other reasons. Netflix, A24 and Disney, release movies and TV shows for one reason, to make money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] golli@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) My line of thought is that yes the end goal is shareholder value/money, but the method varies. You can go for quality or quantity, or for long vs short term profits. And those steps in-between matter. In this case with WB and Superman the amount of money an occasional Superman movie can make is not enough, they want that sweet franchise model. But you can't just will that into place, as they've demonstrated with their failure to do so so far. There has to be some substance at the start before you can roll out even lesser IP and make bank like marvel. Which is why in this instance they probably don't care as much about the profit from this movie, but try to optimize it more for audience and critic appeal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Right, make it now or make it later. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] golli@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago Exactly. And also i think it's hard to see those superhero movies aimed at establishing a franchise as something standalone. [...] Superman is just the first step,” he added. “Over the next year alone, DC Studios will introduce the films Supergirl and Clayface in theaters and the series Lanterns on HBO Max, all part of a bold ten-year plan. This excerpt from the article really says it all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] golli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago* (4 children) Apart from billionaire pet projects like Laika that might be true, but this seems a bit too reductionist. There are many ways to go about it and the difference matters. Unless you want to tell me the the whole media industry from Netflix to A24 does the exact same thing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) I am not following your thinking. The pet projects are the ones done for passion and other reasons. Netflix, A24 and Disney, release movies and TV shows for one reason, to make money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] golli@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) My line of thought is that yes the end goal is shareholder value/money, but the method varies. You can go for quality or quantity, or for long vs short term profits. And those steps in-between matter. In this case with WB and Superman the amount of money an occasional Superman movie can make is not enough, they want that sweet franchise model. But you can't just will that into place, as they've demonstrated with their failure to do so so far. There has to be some substance at the start before you can roll out even lesser IP and make bank like marvel. Which is why in this instance they probably don't care as much about the profit from this movie, but try to optimize it more for audience and critic appeal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Right, make it now or make it later. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] golli@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago Exactly. And also i think it's hard to see those superhero movies aimed at establishing a franchise as something standalone. [...] Superman is just the first step,” he added. “Over the next year alone, DC Studios will introduce the films Supergirl and Clayface in theaters and the series Lanterns on HBO Max, all part of a bold ten-year plan. This excerpt from the article really says it all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) I am not following your thinking. The pet projects are the ones done for passion and other reasons. Netflix, A24 and Disney, release movies and TV shows for one reason, to make money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] golli@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) My line of thought is that yes the end goal is shareholder value/money, but the method varies. You can go for quality or quantity, or for long vs short term profits. And those steps in-between matter. In this case with WB and Superman the amount of money an occasional Superman movie can make is not enough, they want that sweet franchise model. But you can't just will that into place, as they've demonstrated with their failure to do so so far. There has to be some substance at the start before you can roll out even lesser IP and make bank like marvel. Which is why in this instance they probably don't care as much about the profit from this movie, but try to optimize it more for audience and critic appeal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Right, make it now or make it later. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] golli@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago Exactly. And also i think it's hard to see those superhero movies aimed at establishing a franchise as something standalone. [...] Superman is just the first step,” he added. “Over the next year alone, DC Studios will introduce the films Supergirl and Clayface in theaters and the series Lanterns on HBO Max, all part of a bold ten-year plan. This excerpt from the article really says it all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] golli@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) My line of thought is that yes the end goal is shareholder value/money, but the method varies. You can go for quality or quantity, or for long vs short term profits. And those steps in-between matter. In this case with WB and Superman the amount of money an occasional Superman movie can make is not enough, they want that sweet franchise model. But you can't just will that into place, as they've demonstrated with their failure to do so so far. There has to be some substance at the start before you can roll out even lesser IP and make bank like marvel. Which is why in this instance they probably don't care as much about the profit from this movie, but try to optimize it more for audience and critic appeal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Right, make it now or make it later. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] golli@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago Exactly. And also i think it's hard to see those superhero movies aimed at establishing a franchise as something standalone. [...] Superman is just the first step,” he added. “Over the next year alone, DC Studios will introduce the films Supergirl and Clayface in theaters and the series Lanterns on HBO Max, all part of a bold ten-year plan. This excerpt from the article really says it all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Right, make it now or make it later. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] golli@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago Exactly. And also i think it's hard to see those superhero movies aimed at establishing a franchise as something standalone. [...] Superman is just the first step,” he added. “Over the next year alone, DC Studios will introduce the films Supergirl and Clayface in theaters and the series Lanterns on HBO Max, all part of a bold ten-year plan. This excerpt from the article really says it all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] golli@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago Exactly. And also i think it's hard to see those superhero movies aimed at establishing a franchise as something standalone. [...] Superman is just the first step,” he added. “Over the next year alone, DC Studios will introduce the films Supergirl and Clayface in theaters and the series Lanterns on HBO Max, all part of a bold ten-year plan. This excerpt from the article really says it all. permalink fedilink source parent