you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 4 months ago

Sounds like changing definitions to me.

But it's not. It's a hypothesis that was proven incorrect by running the experiment.

That’s translatable to other fields

I didn't say it doesn't ever translate to other fields. I said that it doesn't need to. That's the difference between narrow and general intelligence. You can be superhuman at X but have zero clue how to do Y. It's still intelligence but it's not general or "human level"

  • source
  • parent