It makes total sense if you ignore the epidemiological and genetic evidence that it came from the seafood market and instead hallucinate a ton of non-existing evidence it came from the lab.

There's no evidence to support the lab-leak theory at this time.

I could just as easily say it makes most sense that it came from bats which we know carried the virus and were sold at the market. But the criteria here isn't which of us can put together a sentence that sounds plausible and coherent, but what the people who actually study this stuff say, and they mostly believe that it's unlikely it came from the lab (different source this time, just to be clear!).