A NaN spotted in the wild.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

In Canada if a poorer person picked an item up at $3, then some rich dude walked behind him and it became $4, legally they would then have to give him the item free because of a price difference on an item under $10. Over $10 dollars you automatically get the lower of the two prices.

Edit: I've been informed it's not a law, but a voluntary act by retailers (screams internally).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    This is not a law, it's a common and voluntary thing by the retailer.

    I wish it was a law, that'd be sick and nip this whole surge thing in the bud.

    $15 in Quebec now, that's neat

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Man, egg on my face, I thought it was a law. The way grocery stores are actively turning hostile towards customers we should probably make it a law.

    In truth, we should probably nationalize grocery stores, but a more realistic, capitalism driven, "profits before people" approach would be to make it law.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    I mean, you got it totally right about how it works, that's better than most people. I work in retail and you hear some pretty crazy beliefs about how it works.

    Totally agree with you about nationalizing. Food is a universal right and we should treat it as such.

  • source
  • parent