The most difficult books I've read would be The Road by cormac maccarthy and Dune. How difficult is it compared to these? Is it more difficult or less difficult?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It's... Different. Like, it's not difficult in terms of what is happening in the moment etc but more, "why are these things happening?" There's also a lot to keep track of over the ten books.

If you take Sanderson at one end, where everyone's motivations are explained out loud, often repeatedly, Malazan is at the other end, with you having to work out what some folks/God's are doing and why.

My second time through was arguably one of my favourite reading experiences of all time.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Was the prose too difficult for you? How would you compare it's narration with other fantasy series like ASOIAF Or Wheel of time?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Oh, sorry I missed this! The prose shouldn't be an issue (though Erickson does love the occasional fun word, so for example, I learned what "susurration" means.)

    Again, the actual difficulty of Malazan is understanding why things are happening. Some of the narrators are unreliable (or, more often just don't know the full picture) some people will lie but unlike something easier, where there will be a helpful "Bill narrowed his eyes at these lies but said nothing" its on the reader to decide whom they believe and to what extent.

    I'd say give the first two books a shot. The second is much better than the first and really starts to get into the full majesty of the Malazan Book of the Fallen.

  • source
  • parent