you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 4 months ago (5 children)

In Texas there is a law that only LEOs can carry in an establishment that makes 51% or more of its revenue from alcohol sales, and other businesses can post that firearms are not permitted. I’m curious how this ruling squares with those laws.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Because this law is about places that do not have signs. It's the question of, "I have a gun and want to go into a store, but there is no sign saying "no guns" and I can't find the owner. Who do I talk to so I can get agreement to come into the store?" This is not banning "no guns allowed" signs. It's about having to ask permission of a person who may not even live in the state to enter a place that the public is allowed to enter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    I fucking hate people in this country.

    Like "leave the gun in your fucking car you freak" isn't an option?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    I totally agree. I'm just saying the ruling isn't insane. The people who feel like they need to carry a gun everywhere they go might be insane, but having a law that says a person can't enter a public space without checking for permission to follow their constitutional right isn't a good law.

  • source
  • parent