▲ 169 ▼ The traditional suburban street design of winding roads and cul-de-sacs is just as responsible for U.S. car dependency as the distances created by sprawl, according to new Yale research. (environment.yale.edu) submitted 4 months ago by Valuy@lemmy.zip to c/science@lemmy.world 35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Rothe@piefed.social 1 point 4 months ago (2 children) I don't know why a yard would require a cul-de-sac. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 months ago It’s more than just the cul-de-sac. Look at Bose’s comment above about being blocked from the shopping center by everyone having their own fenced in yards. Even if it’s a straight street, adding yards just increases distance and spreads things out further requiring cars. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bluGill@fedia.io 2 points 4 months ago It doesn't. What a cul-de-sac gives you is assurance that there is no noisy/dangerous traffic by your house at all hours. A street that a bus can serve is also a street where lots of cars will be going by (or at least want to go by even if not allowed) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 months ago It’s more than just the cul-de-sac. Look at Bose’s comment above about being blocked from the shopping center by everyone having their own fenced in yards. Even if it’s a straight street, adding yards just increases distance and spreads things out further requiring cars. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bluGill@fedia.io 2 points 4 months ago It doesn't. What a cul-de-sac gives you is assurance that there is no noisy/dangerous traffic by your house at all hours. A street that a bus can serve is also a street where lots of cars will be going by (or at least want to go by even if not allowed) permalink fedilink source parent