▲ 613 ▼ Quick, Sketch This (lemmy.world) submitted 4 months ago by homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world to c/luigimangione@lemmy.world 36 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 75 points 4 months ago (5 children) Good thing there isn't an ammendmant about a speedy trial permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] dondelelcaro@lemmy.world 33 points 4 months ago (2 children) It's typical in cases like this to waive your right to a speedy trial. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ooterness@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 child) Why do people do this? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 months ago More time to prepare a defense, gather evidence, witnesses, litigate hearings, etc. any of which could drastically change your defense. There isn’t a do over permalink fedilink source parent [–] original_charles@lemmy.world 65 points 4 months ago Amendments don't apply when you fuck with The Oligarchy (TM) permalink fedilink source parent [–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 30 points 4 months ago* Most lawyers advise against invoking that. Gives all sides more time to prepare. Like the defense spent a good bit of time trying to get certain evidence removed from the record as it's own proceeding. The hope was of course if the judge found that the evidence must be excluded then the prosecution may drop charges even before the trial. So yeah Luigi could have had a trial, but I can almost guarantee his lawyer is slowing things down to build his defense and try other types of hearings that strengthen their position once a trial begins permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dondelelcaro@lemmy.world 33 points 4 months ago (2 children) It's typical in cases like this to waive your right to a speedy trial. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ooterness@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 child) Why do people do this? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 months ago More time to prepare a defense, gather evidence, witnesses, litigate hearings, etc. any of which could drastically change your defense. There isn’t a do over permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 child) Why do people do this? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 months ago More time to prepare a defense, gather evidence, witnesses, litigate hearings, etc. any of which could drastically change your defense. There isn’t a do over permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 months ago More time to prepare a defense, gather evidence, witnesses, litigate hearings, etc. any of which could drastically change your defense. There isn’t a do over permalink fedilink source parent
[–] original_charles@lemmy.world 65 points 4 months ago Amendments don't apply when you fuck with The Oligarchy (TM) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 30 points 4 months ago* Most lawyers advise against invoking that. Gives all sides more time to prepare. Like the defense spent a good bit of time trying to get certain evidence removed from the record as it's own proceeding. The hope was of course if the judge found that the evidence must be excluded then the prosecution may drop charges even before the trial. So yeah Luigi could have had a trial, but I can almost guarantee his lawyer is slowing things down to build his defense and try other types of hearings that strengthen their position once a trial begins permalink fedilink source parent