you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It is. It replaces one's own choices with a collective's common "choice", and that is usually substituted with most loud and ambitious people's choice from inside the collective, or the voices that those from outside prefer to hear from it. Bad all around.

Mutual aid and brotherhood are not collectivism. The philosophy that a group of individuals can be regarded as a subject is, possibly without regard for the comprising individuals.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago

    Definitely. Even some abstract ideologies do.

    Say, in ancap finite resources not created by humans (territory, numbers, technologies) are treated as collective property ideally, but since it's impossible to create anything without them, as private property when mixed with labor. Which means that unused territory belongs to a person who claims it and uses it for something.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)