And depicting women with (exaggerated) thick hips is several thousands of years old.
Do you mean the African fertility statues with disproportionate body parts? I hope you realize how that only solidifies my point.
That’s right. There’s absouletly no oversexualized man in animation. /s
Is that a joke? Gaston is a strong man. What part of his design is specifically sexy and revealing? His forearms? This gay man is asking. You could've pointed out the dad from Inside Out at the very least, and even then the only sexy thing about him is the dirty mustache.
What are you even talking about? What do you mean with “my own logic”?
What do you mean? Can you not follow? Keep up.
And what do you mean by that? Are you seriously insinuating that people overreact over fucking Epstein? O.o
No one is sexually harrassing children.
Jesse, what the hell are you on about? I'm saying this site already has a high sensitivity around sexuality involving children for me to have to explain why this is problematic as a kids show AND movies because I did grow up watching Stitch. You all seem to be defending this because you found it sexually arousing at 12 and can't see past that.
children that have no interest/concept of sex don’t notice any sexual innuendo (and these body types aren’t even sexual innuendo).
They do, and they are. I don't know about you, but I do remember being a child. And I also know that many children are quite aware of sexuality, especially nowadays that the web is widespread. And I can point at my own nieces and nephews for that, because I know they get it and they're barely 9. Do you really think sexual jokes don't escape them? They play dumb, just like I did at that age. Don't insult their intelligence.
And for teenagers developing their sexual inner-workings: these teenagers
Who is talking about teenagers?
You spread “no sex-ed books for children” energy, homie.
Quite the contrary, I'm all for teaching children HEALTHY ways of looking at bodies and sexuality. And this ain't it. You just don't get my point.