xthexder comments on Louis Rossmann is suing Samsung after firm offers $330 refund for defective SSD while selling the drives on Amazon for $949 — spat over 4TB 990 Pro SSD is headed to court

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

The problem with that is the first sentence:

Except for the express warranties stated herein

It states pretty clearly to me they are liable for the current market price if they are unable to repair or replace.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social -2 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

That is not a sentence, you took a sentence fragment. Very important distinction in a legal document.

Except for the express warranties stated herein, Samsung disclaims all other express and implied warranties, including but not limited to any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement, course of dealing and usage of trade.

They are saying they are not liable for any implied warranties. The only warranty that is valid is the one defined in the document. They are not saying that section D does not apply to express warranties, as the next sentence talks about them in terms of limiting duration.

Reading is fundamental man.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

Stop trying to act like you know the answer. It could go either way, it's up to the judge and judges can have different interpretations, even at the supreme court level decisions are usually not unanimous.

Fuck you gotta insult the guys reading ability, you both read perfectly fine and neither of you are lawyers so you have no authority even if you read English perfectly well.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments