▲ 253 ▼ Doctors and NHS could be sued for mistakes made by AI tools, report warns (www.medicalprotection.org) submitted 5 months ago by beep@piefed.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] nbsp@programming.dev 80 points 5 months ago (17 children) good permalink fedilink source hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 23 points 5 months ago* (16 children) Not really. Workers are left taking the blame for forced implementation from the executive level. They save the costs and work staff harder... But when it fucks up then the workers can take the blame. Responsibility for this needs to sit higher up with those who forced faulty tools on everyone. AI is being forced into the NHS against all protests and objections. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (3 children) Does the "following orders" defense work sometimes? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 5 points 5 months ago (2 children) Almost always permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago Especially if you have archived that email saying ftfu and AI. I've been hoarding these since this idiocy started. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tabular@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago Only when standards are not at their highest? If so, that wouldn't look good. permalink fedilink source parent [–] KingKong33@lemmy.ml 30 points 5 months ago (3 children) Then they have an obligation to fight back. Or they can lose their job because they blindly followed AI. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Stopwatch1986@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children) And resistance can only be collective. Another reason unionisation is as important as it's ever been. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] valkyre09@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) I thought the NHS had a pretty good union, no? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Stopwatch1986@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago It is but creeping privatisation may change that, as does legislation becoming more hostile to unionisation since the 1980s. The broader point is that individuals can try all they want to preserve their privacy, but then friends, family and organisations spy on them, often unwittingly, eg when we share with them calendar events or email messages. The only way forward is collective resistance, building alliances and influencing public policy. But it's always been like that with systemic issues. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 7 points 5 months ago Any doctor using an LLM or ML algorithm for anything but analysing huge quantities of data deserves to be lambasted permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago Doctors are not like developers. The heads of organizations treat them differently, because their job prospects are better. If they say no, it's a no. Ref: Trying to get doctors in hospital systems to use life-saving notifications for years. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Godort@lemmy.ca -2 points 5 months ago* (5 children) I can understand this to some degree, but I largely disagree. AI is a tool. The user of the tool should be the one that carries responsibility. I don't have the stats, but I imagine that most jobs that relied on hand tools suffered more injury when power tools were introduced, but again, it's up to the person using the tool to use it responsibly. Granted, thats not a perfect analogy because AI definitely doesn't present the same marked improvements as power tools, but the responsibility of the user doesn't change. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (4 children) The power tools are faulty, and they're being forced to use them. You're assuming the people using the AI have the power to reject what the AI says. I'm not sure that's true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Godort@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (3 children) Now that they're personally liable for what it outputs, they definitely can. Your boss can't force you to break the law. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 5 months ago I love how the AI booster narrative for using it shifted so quickly from "buh it it will make medicine better!" to "it's the doctor's fault when it fails!" Or maybe that's the point. Heap unwarranted praise at the feet of the AI corpos, shift all externalities and blame onto the victims. permalink fedilink source parent [–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 5 months ago Being liable for medical malpractice and breaking the law are almost completely mutually exclusive. It's almost always a civil suit, often between insurance companies. permalink fedilink source parent [–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Well, if you want to lose your job, you're right! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 23 points 5 months ago* (16 children) Not really. Workers are left taking the blame for forced implementation from the executive level. They save the costs and work staff harder... But when it fucks up then the workers can take the blame. Responsibility for this needs to sit higher up with those who forced faulty tools on everyone. AI is being forced into the NHS against all protests and objections. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (3 children) Does the "following orders" defense work sometimes? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 5 points 5 months ago (2 children) Almost always permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago Especially if you have archived that email saying ftfu and AI. I've been hoarding these since this idiocy started. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tabular@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago Only when standards are not at their highest? If so, that wouldn't look good. permalink fedilink source parent [–] KingKong33@lemmy.ml 30 points 5 months ago (3 children) Then they have an obligation to fight back. Or they can lose their job because they blindly followed AI. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Stopwatch1986@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children) And resistance can only be collective. Another reason unionisation is as important as it's ever been. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] valkyre09@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) I thought the NHS had a pretty good union, no? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Stopwatch1986@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago It is but creeping privatisation may change that, as does legislation becoming more hostile to unionisation since the 1980s. The broader point is that individuals can try all they want to preserve their privacy, but then friends, family and organisations spy on them, often unwittingly, eg when we share with them calendar events or email messages. The only way forward is collective resistance, building alliances and influencing public policy. But it's always been like that with systemic issues. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 7 points 5 months ago Any doctor using an LLM or ML algorithm for anything but analysing huge quantities of data deserves to be lambasted permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago Doctors are not like developers. The heads of organizations treat them differently, because their job prospects are better. If they say no, it's a no. Ref: Trying to get doctors in hospital systems to use life-saving notifications for years. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Godort@lemmy.ca -2 points 5 months ago* (5 children) I can understand this to some degree, but I largely disagree. AI is a tool. The user of the tool should be the one that carries responsibility. I don't have the stats, but I imagine that most jobs that relied on hand tools suffered more injury when power tools were introduced, but again, it's up to the person using the tool to use it responsibly. Granted, thats not a perfect analogy because AI definitely doesn't present the same marked improvements as power tools, but the responsibility of the user doesn't change. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (4 children) The power tools are faulty, and they're being forced to use them. You're assuming the people using the AI have the power to reject what the AI says. I'm not sure that's true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Godort@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (3 children) Now that they're personally liable for what it outputs, they definitely can. Your boss can't force you to break the law. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 5 months ago I love how the AI booster narrative for using it shifted so quickly from "buh it it will make medicine better!" to "it's the doctor's fault when it fails!" Or maybe that's the point. Heap unwarranted praise at the feet of the AI corpos, shift all externalities and blame onto the victims. permalink fedilink source parent [–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 5 months ago Being liable for medical malpractice and breaking the law are almost completely mutually exclusive. It's almost always a civil suit, often between insurance companies. permalink fedilink source parent [–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Well, if you want to lose your job, you're right! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (3 children) Does the "following orders" defense work sometimes? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 5 points 5 months ago (2 children) Almost always permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago Especially if you have archived that email saying ftfu and AI. I've been hoarding these since this idiocy started. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tabular@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago Only when standards are not at their highest? If so, that wouldn't look good. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 5 points 5 months ago (2 children) Almost always permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago Especially if you have archived that email saying ftfu and AI. I've been hoarding these since this idiocy started. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tabular@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago Only when standards are not at their highest? If so, that wouldn't look good. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago Especially if you have archived that email saying ftfu and AI. I've been hoarding these since this idiocy started. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago Only when standards are not at their highest? If so, that wouldn't look good. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KingKong33@lemmy.ml 30 points 5 months ago (3 children) Then they have an obligation to fight back. Or they can lose their job because they blindly followed AI. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Stopwatch1986@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children) And resistance can only be collective. Another reason unionisation is as important as it's ever been. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] valkyre09@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) I thought the NHS had a pretty good union, no? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Stopwatch1986@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago It is but creeping privatisation may change that, as does legislation becoming more hostile to unionisation since the 1980s. The broader point is that individuals can try all they want to preserve their privacy, but then friends, family and organisations spy on them, often unwittingly, eg when we share with them calendar events or email messages. The only way forward is collective resistance, building alliances and influencing public policy. But it's always been like that with systemic issues. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Stopwatch1986@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children) And resistance can only be collective. Another reason unionisation is as important as it's ever been. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] valkyre09@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) I thought the NHS had a pretty good union, no? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Stopwatch1986@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago It is but creeping privatisation may change that, as does legislation becoming more hostile to unionisation since the 1980s. The broader point is that individuals can try all they want to preserve their privacy, but then friends, family and organisations spy on them, often unwittingly, eg when we share with them calendar events or email messages. The only way forward is collective resistance, building alliances and influencing public policy. But it's always been like that with systemic issues. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] valkyre09@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) I thought the NHS had a pretty good union, no? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Stopwatch1986@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago It is but creeping privatisation may change that, as does legislation becoming more hostile to unionisation since the 1980s. The broader point is that individuals can try all they want to preserve their privacy, but then friends, family and organisations spy on them, often unwittingly, eg when we share with them calendar events or email messages. The only way forward is collective resistance, building alliances and influencing public policy. But it's always been like that with systemic issues. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Stopwatch1986@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago It is but creeping privatisation may change that, as does legislation becoming more hostile to unionisation since the 1980s. The broader point is that individuals can try all they want to preserve their privacy, but then friends, family and organisations spy on them, often unwittingly, eg when we share with them calendar events or email messages. The only way forward is collective resistance, building alliances and influencing public policy. But it's always been like that with systemic issues. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 7 points 5 months ago Any doctor using an LLM or ML algorithm for anything but analysing huge quantities of data deserves to be lambasted permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago Doctors are not like developers. The heads of organizations treat them differently, because their job prospects are better. If they say no, it's a no. Ref: Trying to get doctors in hospital systems to use life-saving notifications for years. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Godort@lemmy.ca -2 points 5 months ago* (5 children) I can understand this to some degree, but I largely disagree. AI is a tool. The user of the tool should be the one that carries responsibility. I don't have the stats, but I imagine that most jobs that relied on hand tools suffered more injury when power tools were introduced, but again, it's up to the person using the tool to use it responsibly. Granted, thats not a perfect analogy because AI definitely doesn't present the same marked improvements as power tools, but the responsibility of the user doesn't change. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (4 children) The power tools are faulty, and they're being forced to use them. You're assuming the people using the AI have the power to reject what the AI says. I'm not sure that's true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Godort@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (3 children) Now that they're personally liable for what it outputs, they definitely can. Your boss can't force you to break the law. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 5 months ago I love how the AI booster narrative for using it shifted so quickly from "buh it it will make medicine better!" to "it's the doctor's fault when it fails!" Or maybe that's the point. Heap unwarranted praise at the feet of the AI corpos, shift all externalities and blame onto the victims. permalink fedilink source parent [–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 5 months ago Being liable for medical malpractice and breaking the law are almost completely mutually exclusive. It's almost always a civil suit, often between insurance companies. permalink fedilink source parent [–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Well, if you want to lose your job, you're right! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (4 children) The power tools are faulty, and they're being forced to use them. You're assuming the people using the AI have the power to reject what the AI says. I'm not sure that's true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Godort@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (3 children) Now that they're personally liable for what it outputs, they definitely can. Your boss can't force you to break the law. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 5 months ago I love how the AI booster narrative for using it shifted so quickly from "buh it it will make medicine better!" to "it's the doctor's fault when it fails!" Or maybe that's the point. Heap unwarranted praise at the feet of the AI corpos, shift all externalities and blame onto the victims. permalink fedilink source parent [–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 5 months ago Being liable for medical malpractice and breaking the law are almost completely mutually exclusive. It's almost always a civil suit, often between insurance companies. permalink fedilink source parent [–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Well, if you want to lose your job, you're right! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (3 children) Now that they're personally liable for what it outputs, they definitely can. Your boss can't force you to break the law. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 5 months ago I love how the AI booster narrative for using it shifted so quickly from "buh it it will make medicine better!" to "it's the doctor's fault when it fails!" Or maybe that's the point. Heap unwarranted praise at the feet of the AI corpos, shift all externalities and blame onto the victims. permalink fedilink source parent [–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 5 months ago Being liable for medical malpractice and breaking the law are almost completely mutually exclusive. It's almost always a civil suit, often between insurance companies. permalink fedilink source parent [–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Well, if you want to lose your job, you're right! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 5 months ago I love how the AI booster narrative for using it shifted so quickly from "buh it it will make medicine better!" to "it's the doctor's fault when it fails!" Or maybe that's the point. Heap unwarranted praise at the feet of the AI corpos, shift all externalities and blame onto the victims. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 5 months ago Being liable for medical malpractice and breaking the law are almost completely mutually exclusive. It's almost always a civil suit, often between insurance companies. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Well, if you want to lose your job, you're right! permalink fedilink source parent