▲ 67 ▼ Steven Spielberg Says James Bond Movies ‘Constantly Turned Me Down’ and ‘If They Asked Me Now’ to Direct the Answer Would Be: ‘You Can’t Afford Me’ Discussion (variety.com) submitted 5 months ago by TheImpressiveX@piefed.social to c/movies@piefed.social 21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (9 children) Spielberg is mentioned in the Epstein files over 100 times. permalink fedilink source hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 9 points 5 months ago (8 children) In what context / capacity? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children) He had a direct relationship with Epstein. Epstein had three separate entries for Spielberg in his black book with plenty of direct communication. They're also both part of the same group of Zionists that lobby on behalf of Israel as well, if that matters to you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 11 points 5 months ago (2 children) If I understand correctly, there were dozens, hundreds, or maybe even thousands of people, many of them quite famous, who had either direct or casual working relationships with Epstein. Many of those, from what I understand, knew Epstein in his capacity as a high-society guy with connections and an ability to procure gifts & favors, and didn't necessarily know about any of his far darker activities. Or if you believe that every single one of them knew about his crazy-evil shit, then an enormous swath of celebrities, rich people and famous people were in on the whole thing. But that's quite the leap. I think if a 'potential' is to be called out at this point, then the public needs to have a strong logistical case built out of the known files, the same way anybody with the presumption of innocence would want the same. At the very least, that's presuming nothing ever goes to court, which is kinda how it's looking right now. The fact is that I know very little about these matters directly, and have zero intention of jumping any guns, here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) I think if a 'potential' is to be called out at this point, then the public needs to have a strong logistical case built out of the known files, the same way anybody with the presumption of innocence would want the same Umm, sir. This is Lemmy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 6 points 5 months ago This actually is PieFed (welcome, stranger), but I take your point! permalink fedilink source parent [–] StillAlive@piefed.world 5 points 4 months ago (3 children) Spielberg is also accused of being anti-Israel, if that matters to you. https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/420446 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (2 children) So was Biden. I guess that means it's true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] StillAlive@piefed.world 2 points 4 months ago Nebulous compared to Spielberg funded organisation directly organising protests. permalink fedilink source parent [–] newton@feddit.online 1 point 4 months ago You forgot about trump permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 9 points 5 months ago (8 children) In what context / capacity? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children) He had a direct relationship with Epstein. Epstein had three separate entries for Spielberg in his black book with plenty of direct communication. They're also both part of the same group of Zionists that lobby on behalf of Israel as well, if that matters to you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 11 points 5 months ago (2 children) If I understand correctly, there were dozens, hundreds, or maybe even thousands of people, many of them quite famous, who had either direct or casual working relationships with Epstein. Many of those, from what I understand, knew Epstein in his capacity as a high-society guy with connections and an ability to procure gifts & favors, and didn't necessarily know about any of his far darker activities. Or if you believe that every single one of them knew about his crazy-evil shit, then an enormous swath of celebrities, rich people and famous people were in on the whole thing. But that's quite the leap. I think if a 'potential' is to be called out at this point, then the public needs to have a strong logistical case built out of the known files, the same way anybody with the presumption of innocence would want the same. At the very least, that's presuming nothing ever goes to court, which is kinda how it's looking right now. The fact is that I know very little about these matters directly, and have zero intention of jumping any guns, here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) I think if a 'potential' is to be called out at this point, then the public needs to have a strong logistical case built out of the known files, the same way anybody with the presumption of innocence would want the same Umm, sir. This is Lemmy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 6 points 5 months ago This actually is PieFed (welcome, stranger), but I take your point! permalink fedilink source parent [–] StillAlive@piefed.world 5 points 4 months ago (3 children) Spielberg is also accused of being anti-Israel, if that matters to you. https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/420446 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (2 children) So was Biden. I guess that means it's true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] StillAlive@piefed.world 2 points 4 months ago Nebulous compared to Spielberg funded organisation directly organising protests. permalink fedilink source parent [–] newton@feddit.online 1 point 4 months ago You forgot about trump permalink fedilink source parent
[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children) He had a direct relationship with Epstein. Epstein had three separate entries for Spielberg in his black book with plenty of direct communication. They're also both part of the same group of Zionists that lobby on behalf of Israel as well, if that matters to you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 11 points 5 months ago (2 children) If I understand correctly, there were dozens, hundreds, or maybe even thousands of people, many of them quite famous, who had either direct or casual working relationships with Epstein. Many of those, from what I understand, knew Epstein in his capacity as a high-society guy with connections and an ability to procure gifts & favors, and didn't necessarily know about any of his far darker activities. Or if you believe that every single one of them knew about his crazy-evil shit, then an enormous swath of celebrities, rich people and famous people were in on the whole thing. But that's quite the leap. I think if a 'potential' is to be called out at this point, then the public needs to have a strong logistical case built out of the known files, the same way anybody with the presumption of innocence would want the same. At the very least, that's presuming nothing ever goes to court, which is kinda how it's looking right now. The fact is that I know very little about these matters directly, and have zero intention of jumping any guns, here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) I think if a 'potential' is to be called out at this point, then the public needs to have a strong logistical case built out of the known files, the same way anybody with the presumption of innocence would want the same Umm, sir. This is Lemmy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 6 points 5 months ago This actually is PieFed (welcome, stranger), but I take your point! permalink fedilink source parent [–] StillAlive@piefed.world 5 points 4 months ago (3 children) Spielberg is also accused of being anti-Israel, if that matters to you. https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/420446 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (2 children) So was Biden. I guess that means it's true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] StillAlive@piefed.world 2 points 4 months ago Nebulous compared to Spielberg funded organisation directly organising protests. permalink fedilink source parent [–] newton@feddit.online 1 point 4 months ago You forgot about trump permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 11 points 5 months ago (2 children) If I understand correctly, there were dozens, hundreds, or maybe even thousands of people, many of them quite famous, who had either direct or casual working relationships with Epstein. Many of those, from what I understand, knew Epstein in his capacity as a high-society guy with connections and an ability to procure gifts & favors, and didn't necessarily know about any of his far darker activities. Or if you believe that every single one of them knew about his crazy-evil shit, then an enormous swath of celebrities, rich people and famous people were in on the whole thing. But that's quite the leap. I think if a 'potential' is to be called out at this point, then the public needs to have a strong logistical case built out of the known files, the same way anybody with the presumption of innocence would want the same. At the very least, that's presuming nothing ever goes to court, which is kinda how it's looking right now. The fact is that I know very little about these matters directly, and have zero intention of jumping any guns, here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) I think if a 'potential' is to be called out at this point, then the public needs to have a strong logistical case built out of the known files, the same way anybody with the presumption of innocence would want the same Umm, sir. This is Lemmy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 6 points 5 months ago This actually is PieFed (welcome, stranger), but I take your point! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) I think if a 'potential' is to be called out at this point, then the public needs to have a strong logistical case built out of the known files, the same way anybody with the presumption of innocence would want the same Umm, sir. This is Lemmy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 6 points 5 months ago This actually is PieFed (welcome, stranger), but I take your point! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 6 points 5 months ago This actually is PieFed (welcome, stranger), but I take your point! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 5 points 4 months ago (3 children) Spielberg is also accused of being anti-Israel, if that matters to you. https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/420446 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (2 children) So was Biden. I guess that means it's true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] StillAlive@piefed.world 2 points 4 months ago Nebulous compared to Spielberg funded organisation directly organising protests. permalink fedilink source parent [–] newton@feddit.online 1 point 4 months ago You forgot about trump permalink fedilink source parent
[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (2 children) So was Biden. I guess that means it's true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] StillAlive@piefed.world 2 points 4 months ago Nebulous compared to Spielberg funded organisation directly organising protests. permalink fedilink source parent [–] newton@feddit.online 1 point 4 months ago You forgot about trump permalink fedilink source parent
[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 2 points 4 months ago Nebulous compared to Spielberg funded organisation directly organising protests. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] newton@feddit.online 1 point 4 months ago You forgot about trump permalink fedilink source parent