Quest to create viable human sex cells in lab progressing rapidly, with huge implications for reproduction

Scientists are just a few years from creating viable human sex cells in the lab, according to an internationally renowned pioneer of the field, who says the advance could open up biology-defying possibilities for reproduction.

Speaking to the Guardian, Prof Katsuhiko Hayashi, a developmental geneticist at the University of Osaka, said rapid progress is being made towards being able to transform adult skin or blood cells into eggs and sperm, a feat of genetic conjury known as in-vitro gametogenesis (IVG).

His own lab is about seven years away from the milestone, he predicts. Other frontrunners include a team at the University of Kyoto and a California-based startup, Conception Biosciences, whose Silicon Valley backers include the OpenAI founder, Sam Altman and whose CEO told the Guardian that growing eggs in the lab “might be the best tool we have to reverse population decline” and could pave the way for human gene editing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 year ago (10 children)

A stable human population of 9 billion cannot have endless growth in population, but you can conceivably endlessly improve people's lifestyles through technological improvement (well, until we know everything there is to know about science)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (8 children)

    The markets would be growing as productivity is always growing, and there's real wage growth as well, so there's more goods and services people consume over time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (4 children)

    It's not real consumer/producer, real compensation is inflation-adjusted

    Well, the mean compensation is always going to be higher than the median, right? The graph was originally posted to show that wages grow slower than the productivity. Both graphs are for the workers, but a lot of the difference is mean vs median. There are also other factors.

    For example, total compensation grew faster than wages because company health plans just cost companies more these days. Health care prices grew faster than inflation, so clearly companies had to pay more for them.

    In recent years the real (inflation-adjusted) wage growth has been solid

    The price of groceries in hours worked had been mostly dropping

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They are as good as what we had in the 70s, but women actually entered the workforce and China is manufacturing everything so all things considered economy under Biden was not so bad after all

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments