you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They’re less ugly than a jersey barrier and do less damage to cars that can’t stay in their lane while still protecting cyclists.

But yeah, visibility is key. I wonder if they are still visible in ten years. That’s my only objection to things like raised crossings: once the paint wears off or in snow they become a lot less visible and no longer as effective. I hate that both as a driver and a cyclist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    This is mostly a US problem though. Road designers in the US just don't seem to actually understand how to implement these things in a sensible manner.

    The way to do things like raised crossings is to make them out of a different type of road surface, moving over to brick pavers is common, so there's always a visual indication.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment