58
should i switch to linux? (programming.dev)
submitted 5 months ago by to c/linux@lemmy.ml
81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] [S] 3 points 5 months ago (6 children)
[removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 24 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    Firefox is unlikely to ever sell your data or redirect websites or participate in a cryptoscam or show you advertisements with an adblocker on. Brave has done, at one point or another, all of that.

    Plus firefox is not manifest v3, so you can actually have a safe browsing experience whereas all chromium based browsers are now inherently more vulnerable to malware thanks to google.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    all chromium based browsers are now inherently more vulnerable to malware thanks to google.

    Could you explain why? While at it, would you be so kind to mention why security-focused projects like GrapheneOS and secureblue stick to Chromium-based browsers despite that?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    https://grapheneos.org/usage#web-browsing

    Chromium and their particular fork have much better exploit hardening via sandboxing.

    My understanding is Firefox has better anti-fingerprinting and uBlock origin via manifest v2 support (or v2 features ported to v3).

    The argument often used is malicious ads. Sandboxing and hardening largely mitigates ads that contain exploits, but it doesn't protect against social engineering, crypto mining, tracking, etc.

    So I guess it comes down to your threat model and desired experience.

    I personally prefer the uBlock origin experience, but an ad free experience and escape from targeted advertising was my target opsec when venturing into privacy.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    Thanks! Your comment prompted me to check out this entry in uBlock Origin's documentation that also underlines why Firefox(-based browsers) work better for the purposes of content-blocking.

    So I guess it comes down to your threat model and desired experience.

    Can't agree more.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago*

    Brave is a bad product as of now.

    Firefox with ublock is at least acceptably performant on desktop and mobile without all the crypto/tracking downsides of Brave or the open unpatched vulnerabilities (as of this posting) of Chrome/chromium (that also affect Brave)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent