"There is consumer pressure to back away from technology that is unnecessary to perform everyday tasks."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I wish. Instead, the EU releases continously new regulations which makes cars, especially small ones, prohibitively expensive, all in the name of safety. Cheap simple cars are a thing of the past, all new cars are stuffed with unnecessary but mandatory tech just so car manufacturers can make a higher profit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    I really think there should be a middle zone between the quadricycle regulation (like the Citroen Ami, Renault Twizy, etc) and “normal” cars. Make a class for simple and cheap cars that are more capable than the quadricycles, but still have some conservative power and/or speed limits, size limits, and some safety standards.

    I’m imagining a class of vehicles that are like a modern take on the post-war economy cars like the Fiat 500, Citroen 2cv, VW beetle, etc. Something similar to the Japanese kei cars, but probably even more restrictive on power.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I wonder if someone sat down and really looked at the legistation and the engineering, if we couldn't get away with cheaper solutions. Cars have something like a dozen purpose built computers now, can't we just replace all that bs with a standard piece of hardware? Lane tracking, eye tracking, it's like everything they do is bespoke.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    That sounds a bit like the U.S. regulations requiring sealed-beam headlights, where manufacturers had to choose between a handful of allowed designs. That way, the govt was sure that all headlights were up to safety spec.

    It's a good idea, and could help prevent things like the VW emissions cheating scandal.

  • source
  • parent