▲ 1004 ▼ Hackers Simply Asked Meta AI to Give Them Access to High-Profile Instagram Accounts. It Worked (www.404media.co) submitted 5 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world 122 comments fedilink hide all child comments 😂 6
[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 12 points 5 months ago (12 children) This isn't even a hack, it's just poorly written endpoints. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago (11 children) Would you consider phreaking equivalent to hacking? This is AI phreaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (6 children) TIL about phreaking permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (5 children) Then this is also probably new to you The Anarchist Cookbook permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (4 children) I need to set aside some time to read that although I'm not an anarchist myself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 months ago* (2 children) It was largely overblown due to it getting banned. It was also published in the height of the Vietnam War, when the big evil communists were coming to brainwash your children into eating each other. It has a lot of blatantly incorrect info, which could be outright “blow up in your face” dangerous to anyone attempting the things in it. It’s not all wrong, but certain recipes have incorrect info that could easily lead to accidents. Also fair warning, the UK will give people hard prison time simply for owning it. So maybe keep that shit onion-encrypted if you’re in the UK. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago* Thanks for the warning on the blowing up! Well, I'm certainly not in authoritarian UK. permalink fedilink source parent [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago published in the height of the Vietnam War your children into eating each other. What is '69 ? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago I linked to the Wikipedia article, not the handbook inself. And more for the (obsolete) phreaking content than the (highly dangerous) explosive content. permalink fedilink source parent [–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago Kinda. If you designed a publicly addressable system since 1985 and didn’t design it for security then you’re asking for it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (2 children) It's not phreaking. Social engineering. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago The entity being manipulated is not human so I would not classify it as social engineering, even if similar techniques are used (help me my grandmother needs info). permalink fedilink source parent [–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago So, I'm currently developing a chatbot for my company. If an LLM needs to do something, a developer must build a tool. It just so happens that this tool that was built did not take traditional security into account. Really it should only be using the tools already built for users, but it seems the Jr. Devs that have been replacing seniors do not have the sensibilities yet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago (11 children) Would you consider phreaking equivalent to hacking? This is AI phreaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (6 children) TIL about phreaking permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (5 children) Then this is also probably new to you The Anarchist Cookbook permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (4 children) I need to set aside some time to read that although I'm not an anarchist myself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 months ago* (2 children) It was largely overblown due to it getting banned. It was also published in the height of the Vietnam War, when the big evil communists were coming to brainwash your children into eating each other. It has a lot of blatantly incorrect info, which could be outright “blow up in your face” dangerous to anyone attempting the things in it. It’s not all wrong, but certain recipes have incorrect info that could easily lead to accidents. Also fair warning, the UK will give people hard prison time simply for owning it. So maybe keep that shit onion-encrypted if you’re in the UK. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago* Thanks for the warning on the blowing up! Well, I'm certainly not in authoritarian UK. permalink fedilink source parent [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago published in the height of the Vietnam War your children into eating each other. What is '69 ? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago I linked to the Wikipedia article, not the handbook inself. And more for the (obsolete) phreaking content than the (highly dangerous) explosive content. permalink fedilink source parent [–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago Kinda. If you designed a publicly addressable system since 1985 and didn’t design it for security then you’re asking for it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (2 children) It's not phreaking. Social engineering. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago The entity being manipulated is not human so I would not classify it as social engineering, even if similar techniques are used (help me my grandmother needs info). permalink fedilink source parent [–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago So, I'm currently developing a chatbot for my company. If an LLM needs to do something, a developer must build a tool. It just so happens that this tool that was built did not take traditional security into account. Really it should only be using the tools already built for users, but it seems the Jr. Devs that have been replacing seniors do not have the sensibilities yet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (6 children) TIL about phreaking permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (5 children) Then this is also probably new to you The Anarchist Cookbook permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (4 children) I need to set aside some time to read that although I'm not an anarchist myself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 months ago* (2 children) It was largely overblown due to it getting banned. It was also published in the height of the Vietnam War, when the big evil communists were coming to brainwash your children into eating each other. It has a lot of blatantly incorrect info, which could be outright “blow up in your face” dangerous to anyone attempting the things in it. It’s not all wrong, but certain recipes have incorrect info that could easily lead to accidents. Also fair warning, the UK will give people hard prison time simply for owning it. So maybe keep that shit onion-encrypted if you’re in the UK. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago* Thanks for the warning on the blowing up! Well, I'm certainly not in authoritarian UK. permalink fedilink source parent [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago published in the height of the Vietnam War your children into eating each other. What is '69 ? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago I linked to the Wikipedia article, not the handbook inself. And more for the (obsolete) phreaking content than the (highly dangerous) explosive content. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (5 children) Then this is also probably new to you The Anarchist Cookbook permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (4 children) I need to set aside some time to read that although I'm not an anarchist myself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 months ago* (2 children) It was largely overblown due to it getting banned. It was also published in the height of the Vietnam War, when the big evil communists were coming to brainwash your children into eating each other. It has a lot of blatantly incorrect info, which could be outright “blow up in your face” dangerous to anyone attempting the things in it. It’s not all wrong, but certain recipes have incorrect info that could easily lead to accidents. Also fair warning, the UK will give people hard prison time simply for owning it. So maybe keep that shit onion-encrypted if you’re in the UK. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago* Thanks for the warning on the blowing up! Well, I'm certainly not in authoritarian UK. permalink fedilink source parent [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago published in the height of the Vietnam War your children into eating each other. What is '69 ? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago I linked to the Wikipedia article, not the handbook inself. And more for the (obsolete) phreaking content than the (highly dangerous) explosive content. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (4 children) I need to set aside some time to read that although I'm not an anarchist myself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 months ago* (2 children) It was largely overblown due to it getting banned. It was also published in the height of the Vietnam War, when the big evil communists were coming to brainwash your children into eating each other. It has a lot of blatantly incorrect info, which could be outright “blow up in your face” dangerous to anyone attempting the things in it. It’s not all wrong, but certain recipes have incorrect info that could easily lead to accidents. Also fair warning, the UK will give people hard prison time simply for owning it. So maybe keep that shit onion-encrypted if you’re in the UK. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago* Thanks for the warning on the blowing up! Well, I'm certainly not in authoritarian UK. permalink fedilink source parent [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago published in the height of the Vietnam War your children into eating each other. What is '69 ? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago I linked to the Wikipedia article, not the handbook inself. And more for the (obsolete) phreaking content than the (highly dangerous) explosive content. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 months ago* (2 children) It was largely overblown due to it getting banned. It was also published in the height of the Vietnam War, when the big evil communists were coming to brainwash your children into eating each other. It has a lot of blatantly incorrect info, which could be outright “blow up in your face” dangerous to anyone attempting the things in it. It’s not all wrong, but certain recipes have incorrect info that could easily lead to accidents. Also fair warning, the UK will give people hard prison time simply for owning it. So maybe keep that shit onion-encrypted if you’re in the UK. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago* Thanks for the warning on the blowing up! Well, I'm certainly not in authoritarian UK. permalink fedilink source parent [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago published in the height of the Vietnam War your children into eating each other. What is '69 ? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago* Thanks for the warning on the blowing up! Well, I'm certainly not in authoritarian UK. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago published in the height of the Vietnam War your children into eating each other. What is '69 ? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago I linked to the Wikipedia article, not the handbook inself. And more for the (obsolete) phreaking content than the (highly dangerous) explosive content. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago Kinda. If you designed a publicly addressable system since 1985 and didn’t design it for security then you’re asking for it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (2 children) It's not phreaking. Social engineering. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago The entity being manipulated is not human so I would not classify it as social engineering, even if similar techniques are used (help me my grandmother needs info). permalink fedilink source parent [–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago So, I'm currently developing a chatbot for my company. If an LLM needs to do something, a developer must build a tool. It just so happens that this tool that was built did not take traditional security into account. Really it should only be using the tools already built for users, but it seems the Jr. Devs that have been replacing seniors do not have the sensibilities yet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago The entity being manipulated is not human so I would not classify it as social engineering, even if similar techniques are used (help me my grandmother needs info). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago So, I'm currently developing a chatbot for my company. If an LLM needs to do something, a developer must build a tool. It just so happens that this tool that was built did not take traditional security into account. Really it should only be using the tools already built for users, but it seems the Jr. Devs that have been replacing seniors do not have the sensibilities yet. permalink fedilink source parent