I would say this case illustrates three things: money wins every election campaign; there are no regulations whatsoever to limit the influence of wealthy interest groups; and the majority of citizens are so misinformed, apathetic, uneducated, or malicious that they vote against a candidate who is virtually the only one in his party with the courage to still defend what little remains of the rule of law.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments